Questions an assessment may address
- Are the results interpretable?
- Which inconsistencies need clarification?
- Are there alternative explanations for atypical responses?
How we approach this matter
We integrate interviews, records and suitable instruments. Indicators are considered alongside comprehension, fatigue, language, emotional state and context. An isolated discrepancy is not automatically interpreted as deliberate deception.
What the report provides
An explanation of result validity, observed inconsistencies, limitations and hypotheses requiring further examination.
Useful material for the initial review
- Lawfully available protocols and results.
- Previous reports and testing conditions.
- History and corroborating records.
A brief description is enough for the first contact. Document sharing is arranged afterwards.
A common question
Does one indicator establish malingering?
No. Interpretation requires multiple sources and consideration of alternative explanations before drawing a conclusion.